Patrick Kilian <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > >> There's a bulk import happening of data in Massachusetts, USA, and >> Maplint is flagging every single node with not-in-map-features because >> of the "attribution" tag applied to these nodes (see >> http://server.tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=maplint&z=12&x=1239&y=1518 >> for an example.) This causes Inkscape to use enormous amounts of >> memory when rendering these tiles -- last night, I had a render fail >> because the Inkscape processes rendering z12 and z13 managed to fill >> all 6 GB of RAM+swap on my system. > If the "attribution" tag is common enough to cause that problem it > should just be listed and explained in map features. If you put it in > feel free to poke me. I'll run the rebuild the maplints "is in map > features" list and commit it to svn.
If a mass import introduces a new tag I would not call it common even it is in the database a million times. Since OSM promotes free form tagging not-in-map-features is bound to produce a lot of false positives. It might be a good idea to have an ignore list besides Map Features on the wiki. Matthias _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
