On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Knut Arne Bjørndal <[email protected]<bob%[email protected]> > wrote:
> > > There is already a ignore list, in the source of the perl > script. Since it requires SVN access to modify the test anyway I don't > see why we don't simply add one more tag that way instead of doing yet > more ugly wiki-parsing. > > I think there's a bit of a difference between things like tiger:* and > attribution though, it sounds like a reasonable tag to me... > > (but NO! don't start another voting thread) I tried to strike this conversation up in the talk-us list, but didn't get very far: It doesn't seem to make sense to apply attribution tags to individual nodes. That just makes the nodes a lot more heavy weight, both in the database and in the downloaded OSM data files. Can we put a recommendation on mass imports that nodes that are parts of ways should not be attributed?
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
