Knut Arne Bjørndal <[email protected]> writes: > There is already a ignore list, in the source of the perl > script. Since it requires SVN access to modify the test anyway I don't > see why we don't simply add one more tag that way instead of doing yet > more ugly wiki-parsing.
That ignore list could be a lot simpler than Map Features, so the wiki-parsing would be a lot less ugly. I just think it would be a good thing if everybody who can invent his own tag could tell maplint not to complain about it. It would already be an improvement if the ignore list was a separate text file which could be linked to from the not-in-map-features wiki page. That would make it a bit more transparent. > > I think there's a bit of a difference between things like tiger:* and > attribution though, it sounds like a reasonable tag to me... Sure, there is nothing wrong with adding reasonable tags to Map Features. I was thinking in more general terms. > > (but NO! don't start another voting thread) How about voting on maplint's ignore list? <duck> Matthias _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
