On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think there's a bit of a difference between things like tiger:* and >> attribution though, it sounds like a reasonable tag to me... >> >> (but NO! don't start another voting thread) > > I tried to strike this conversation up in the talk-us list, but didn't get > very far: > > It doesn't seem to make sense to apply attribution tags to individual nodes. > That just makes the nodes a lot more heavy weight, both in the database and > in the downloaded OSM data files. Can we put a recommendation on mass > imports that nodes that are parts of ways should not be attributed?
I agree with you Ian. Nodes that are part of ways are already adequately attributed. Cheers, Adam _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
