"Adam Schreiber" <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I think there's a bit of a difference between things like tiger:* and >>> attribution though, it sounds like a reasonable tag to me... >>> >>> (but NO! don't start another voting thread) >> >> I tried to strike this conversation up in the talk-us list, but didn't get >> very far: >> >> It doesn't seem to make sense to apply attribution tags to individual nodes. >> That just makes the nodes a lot more heavy weight, both in the database and >> in the downloaded OSM data files. Can we put a recommendation on mass >> imports that nodes that are parts of ways should not be attributed? > > I agree with you Ian. Nodes that are part of ways are already > adequately attributed.
But you can not easily distinguish them from nodes someone else added. Matthias _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
