At 10:34 AM -0400 4/12/08, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: >Thanks, Dave. I was under the impression from discussion long ago (and >my memory may be wrong) that the change wasn't as trivial as it seemed. > But if no other solution surfaces, I'll give this a try. >
John, The change is indeed non-trivial if you want to make 100 KHz from 5 MHz. However, if you don't need the first stage to be the correct 100 KHz, it's a lot easier. -- --David Forbes, Tucson, AZ http://www.cathodecorner.com/ _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
