John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > Thanks, Bruce. I considered the idea of a multiplier but would like to > use a software-only solution if I can. That's not only for simplicity, > but also to eliminate additional sources of jitter; the experiment I > have in mind is to test the second-to-second noise (and short term noise > trends) of GPS and other PPS sources,* so I'm looking for as stable a > reference as I can get. The additional noise from a mulitplier may be > small, but I want to minimize the number of unknowns. > > Thanks! > > John > > * I realize that I'll also be limited by counter resolution. > ---- > John
If minimising the PPS jitter, is important adding a single D flipflop to resynchronise the output PPS signal to the 5MHz input will be worthwhile. A relatively complex chip like a PIC is likely to produce a PPS output signal with a jitter much greater than that produced by a single flipflop. Measuring the PPS output jitter of the PIC will be somewhat challenging as It I would expect it to be somewhat less than 100ps. The corresponding output jitter at the resynchronising flipflop output should be significantly less than 10ps even for a 74HC74. In this case only the flipflop's random jitter is significant as the frequency and duty cycle of the PPS input to the flipflop are constant apart from the effects of jitter. Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
