David Forbes said the following on 04/12/2008 12:16 PM: > At 10:34 AM -0400 4/12/08, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: >> Thanks, Dave. I was under the impression from discussion long ago (and >> my memory may be wrong) that the change wasn't as trivial as it seemed. >> But if no other solution surfaces, I'll give this a try. >> > > John, > > The change is indeed non-trivial if you want to make 100 KHz from 5 > MHz. However, if you don't need the first stage to be the correct 100 > KHz, it's a lot easier. >
OK, I only need the PPS output, so losing 100kHz isn't a problem. Thanks! John _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
