Hi

There is actually a range of crystals shown in the pictures. The gold plated 5 
MHz 
crystal is probably an overtone part. It could be fairly precise. The 25 MHz 
part is
plated with something like silver. It probably is a *much* lower precision 
part. There 
likely are long stories that explain just why this or that package got used in 
this
or that application. 

Bob

> On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Jeremy Nichols <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The OP's picture looks very much like the crystals that HP's "Frequency and 
> Time" division in Santa Clara (02 was their division number) used to 
> manufacture back in the 1970s. My picture shows a 1 MHz crystal that HP used 
> in the predecessor to the HP-105A (perhaps the 101A).
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> http://s323.photobucket.com/user/Jeremy5848/media/Miscellaneous/Crystal_1140587_zps0jxjpoal.jpg.html
> 
> 
> 
> On 2/2/2016 12:24 PM, Don Latham wrote:
>> You have it right, iovane. At the least, they should be protected from light,
>> thermal radiation, and emf.   Won'drous things will happen if the crystal and
>> its structure are subjected to radiation through the glass. I'd suggest a 
>> foam
>> wrap in a tin can as a minimum. Put the oscillator cat in there too.
>> Don
>> 
>> iovane--- via time-nuts
>>> I think that these crystals were designed to be placed in an oven, which
>>> worked
>>> as a shield too. I have a similar crystal made by Racal in the 60's, and in 
>>> my
>>> case it is fitted with the classic octal tube-type plug. It was housed 
>>> (still
>>> is) in a heavy massive shimmering chrome-plated cylindrical brass 
>>> enclosure, a
>>> beauty to see, It was the timebase of a tube-type synthesizer with lots of
>>> tubes. Themperature control was achieved by means of a mercury thermometer 
>>> in
>>> which mercury actuated a contact when reaching a wire crossing the capillary
>>> tube.
>>> 
>>> Antonio I8IOV
>>> 
>>>> Da: Bob Camp <[email protected]>
>>>> Data: 02/02/2016 13.15
>>>> A: "Discussion of precise time and frequency 
>>>> measurement"<[email protected]>
>>>> Ogg: Re: [time-nuts] Glass Envelope Quartz Crystals
>>>> 
>>>> Hi
>>>> 
>>>> Since the 25 MHz crystal has already been soldered into a circuit, putting 
>>>> it
>>> in a
>>>> socket is probably not a real good idea. It’s also a leaded part. Even with
>>> fat pins
>>>> sockets can be an issue. With wire leads, you are asking for trouble.
>>>> 
>>>> Functionally, there is little there is little difference between a glass
>>> package crystal
>>>> and a metal package. About the only real one is the obvious - one has a 
>>>> metal
>>> shield
>>>> you can (but sometimes don’t)  ground.
>>>> 
>>>> Bob
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 9:58 PM, Daniel Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I purchased a pair of interesting glass envelope crystals for a project.
>>>>> Here are some pictures:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://syncchannel.blogspot.com/2016/02/glass-envelope-quartz-crystals.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does anyone have an idea about what mount/socket I should buy for these? I
>>>>> read a previous thread on the list about Bliley crystals using a B7G 
>>>>> mount,
>>>>> but I'm not sure if that type might work here.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also, when building up a circuit to make these oscillate, are there any
>>>>> specific differences about crystals in this package that I should keep in
>>>>> mind?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks much,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dan W.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to