Brad Knowles wrote: > If you want low latency/low jitter (i.e., down into the single-digit > millisecond range), you have to store the data in memory. There's just > no way around that problem, at least not with the latest technology we > have available to us today.
Correct. You have to store it in memory. So what? It's not like the few kilobytes this would take is going to hurt any reasonable desktop PC, much less server, built in the last 5 years. _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
