Simon Arlott wrote:
On Fri, June 15, 2007 11:48, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Simon Arlott wrote:
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=native
IP is not only business it's chargable monthly. I strongly suspect that
such ISPs if they ever do deploy ipv6 will hand out a /128 and want $$$
for anything else - leading to ipv6 NAT becoming popular (only cisco
support it at the moment) and rendering the whole thing pointless.
RIPE will not allow this, each "user" has to get a /48s...
Sure about that? At my provider I get a /60, probably from a /32 or /48
assigned to the provider.
And even that is very much overkill for most users.
I experimented with it 5 years ago, it worked but provided nothing useful.
When I upgraded my system I never bothered to get it working again.
When someone or something provides a reason for me to bother trying again, I
certainly will. But the argument "this makes it possible to access all
your devices
directly from the Internet" for me sounds more like a disadvantage...
Rob
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
