|
Thomas Szasz has been railing against the practice
of "expert" analysis and diagnosis of public figures for decades. The practice
is certainly not new. For example, Judith Herman ("Trauma and Recovery",
1992) documents diagnoses of socially active (and
therefore problematic) women in the late 19th Century as
hysterical. These
pronouncements are particularly galling when it
appears that they have been written with political
motivations. On the other hand, Erik Erikson's
psycho-biographies of Ghandi and Martin Luther, for example, are classics
of both neo-psychoanalytic and historical writing. Similar to those
who villified others, Erikson's writings are also based on using public
record and interviews of persons who knew the subject rather than testing
and interviewing the actual person.
In terms of ethics, it is unethical for a
psychologist to claim (say, for billing purposes) that a client has a disorder
that he or she does not actually suffer from. Psychiatric/psychological
diagnoses and analyses are unreliable enough even when the subject of the
diagnosis submits to tests and interviews. If Dr. Frank has been Mr.
Bush's psychiatrist, then his opinion, after careful assessment of
GWB, might be valid, but the book, if without Bush's consent, would
be unethical. If Frank has had no professional relationship with Mr.
Bush, then his psychiatric opinion of him as an individual is worthless,
and the publication of the book as coming from an "expert" in these matters is,
in my opinion, unethical. If Mr. Bush were not such a public figure
the book would possibly be libelous.
While I have enjoyed Erikson's psycho-biographies,
I would not encourage the same method being applied to a living
person.
I think this is true even though I believe (
in my opinion as a voting citizen) Mr. Bush is not psychologically capable of
being a competent President of the United States of America.
Bill Scott
--- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Title: Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? �"Bush on the Couch" by Justin Frank, M.D.
- ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by Just... Patricia Spiegel
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Todd Nelson
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Rick Froman
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Bill Scott
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... dkoren
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Louis_Schmier
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Drnanjo
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Rick Adams
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Dan Koren
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Christopher D. Green
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Rick Adams
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Drnanjo
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Christopher D. Green
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch"... Beth Benoit
