|
Speaking of profiling (whether accurate or
inaccurate), today's New York Times has an article about how the
federal sky marshals who are assigned to be "inconspicuous passengers" on
airplanes are requesting that the dress code (suit, tie, dress shoes, even on a
hot day) be changed. They complain that the present code makes them
so conspicuous that a 12-year-old could pick them out, and thus endangers their
safety since it must be concluded that terrorists would have the same
ease.
The argument given by the other side is that the
air marshals' clothing shouldn't be "too casual," because they must dress to
command respect in the event of a terrorist emergency. (The Federal Air
Marshal Service says there is a dress policy, but they declined to give
specifics, citing "security sensitive information." [Newsflash,
FAMS: I think the secret's out: on page A7 of the New York
Times!])
Beth Benoit
University System of New
Hampshire
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... Bill Scott
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... dkoren
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... Louis_Schmier
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... Drnanjo
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... Rick Adams
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... Dan Koren
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... Christopher D. Green
- RE: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... Rick Adams
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... Drnanjo
- Re: ETHICAL ISSUE? "Bush on the Couch" by ... Christopher D. Green
- Beth Benoit
