Re: APA President-elect

[Scott Lilienfeld]

TIPS members interested in both sides of the argument concerning the 
merits of remaining in or leaving APA may want to read the following 
debate between Dr. Kenneth Sher (University of Missouri at Columbia) and 
yours truly (Emory University) that appeared in the most recent issue of 
"Clinical Science," the newsletter of Section 3, Division 12 of APA 
(better known as the Society for a Science of Clinical Psychology or 
SSCP). As you'll see, my friend Sher argues that SSCP should remain in 
APA, whereas I disagree. Although the debate concerns SSCP specifically, 
its implications for other APA members should be obvious. There are 
clearly good arguments on both sides, and I leave it up TIPS members to 
weigh the pros and cons. ....Scott

Here's the link to the Clinical Science newletter issue:
http://pantheon.yale.edu/~tat22/Fall%202004%20Newsletter%20Final.pdf
--
Scott O. Lilienfeld, Ph.D.
Associate Professor 
Department of Psychology, Room 206 
Emory University
532 N. Kilgo Circle 
Atlanta, Georgia 30322

(404) 727-1125 (phone)
(404) 727-0372 (FAX)
Home Page: http://www.emory.edu/PSYCH/Faculty/lilienfeld.html
The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice:
www.srmhp.org
The Master in the Art of Living makes little distinction between his work and his 
play, his labor and his leisure, his mind and his body, his education and his 
recreation, his love and his intellectual passions.  He hardly knows which is which.  
He simply pursues his vision of excellence in whatever he does, leaving others to 
decide whether he is working or playing.  To him – he is always doing both.
- Zen Buddhist text 
 (slightly modified) 



---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]