This is not in disagreement with any of the things that have already been mentioned or said. Just a point of curiousity. Since we, psychologists, have a vested interest in this matter, does anybody know of any case in which an external committee (i.e., comprised of people outside psychology) has been requested to review this practice? And if so, what was their "verdict" and recommendations? Any leads, references, or links would be highly appreciated. Many thanks in advance, Danny
On Wed, February 28, 2007 11:34 pm, Miguel Roig said: > This is considerably dated, but worth looking at: > > A census of subject pool characteristics and policies. Sieber, Joan E.; > Saks, Michael J.; American Psychologist, Vol 44(7), Jul 1989. pp. > 1053-1061 > > Miguel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerald Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:28 PM > To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) > Subject: [tips] undergrad research participation > > > Do tipsters know of any differences between research-heavy institutions > and other colleges regarding undergrad participation in research? My > understanding is that such participation should be voluntary, > alternative options should be provided, etc. Some institutions or > departments however, may require such participation and I am wondering > about the reasons and problems of such policies. Thanks, Gary > > > > > > Gerald L. (Gary) Peterson, Ph.D. > Professor, Psychology > Saginaw Valley State University > University Center, MI 48710 > 989-964-4491 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > To make changes to your subscription go to: > http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=engl > ish > > > > > --- > To make changes to your subscription go to: > http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english > > > --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
