On 4 March 2007 in response to the question
>> Is anyone on this list going to make a paradigm shift in their  
>> professional endeavors based on one study?

Peter Harzam wrote
>Why not? Physics did on the basis of one study (Einstein's three  
>brief theoretical papers in  one year).

To which Chris Green replied:
>Actually not. Almost no one took Einstein's theory of relativity 
>seriously until after Eddington published the solar eclipse study of
1920.

Peter’s reference to three theoretical papers in one year indicates he is
alluding to 1905, and therefore the relativity paper in question is that
on special relativity. Einstein’s special relativity paper was published
in late September 1905, and Max Planck later reported that it "immediately
aroused my lively attention." (Max von Laue wrote that when he came to
Berlin as Planck's assistant in the autumn of 1905 the first lecture he
heard was one by Planck on the newly published paper.) Numerous physicists
of varying degrees of eminence had become interested in the theory by
1907, and some actually came to Bern to discuss it with Einstein. So some
physicists certainly took the special theory seriously from the start.
(More generally, in May 2006 Einstein wrote to a friend, "My [1905] papers
are meeting with much acknowledgement and are giving rise to further
investigations.")

Chris's comment is, of course, in relation to general relativity, more or
less finalised by 1915. It is not quite the case that almost no one took
the theory seriously, more that most physicists were bemused by it (and
unable to deal with the rather esoteric mathematics involved, for which
Einstein himself had had to seek the help of a mathematician friend in
1912). But Einstein had a solid core of support (including Max Born), such
that he was able to write to a mathematical colleague in 1916 that though
the theory had many opponents, "I am consoled by the following
circumstance: the otherwise determined intellectual strength of the
adherents greatly exceeds that of the opponents." Among those who took an
active interest in the theory were Lorentz, Ehrenfest, and the great
astronomer de Sitter, who sent a copy of Einstein’s 1916 treatise on the
general theory to Eddington in England, immediately awaking his interest.
Aside from such people, I would say that the most general reaction of
physicists to the general theory was bewilderment rather than outright
opposition.

Allen Esterson
Former lecturer, Science Department
Southwark College, London
http://www.esterson.org/

---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to