Jeff Ricker wrote: > Yeah . . . what Paul said!! Because I have not studied in > depth, or for a long time, philosophical discussions of reductionism (and related > concepts such as emergent properties, etc.), I have been struggling to make clear to > myself (and you) some half-formed thoughts I had about these issues and how they > applied to psychology. I will have to read this article by Fodor. I think that this > was the direction I was trying to head with my own comments, even if it doesn't seem > like it from what I said. Ah, it's times like this that make having learned to read worthwhile. ;) Paul Smith Alverno College Milwaukee
- Re: Alternative ways of knowing (AWK) Jeff Ricker
- Re: Alternative ways of knowing (AWK) Paul Brandon
- Re: Alternative ways of knowing (AWK) Bob Keefer
- Re: Alternative ways of knowing (AWK) Jeff Ricker
- Re: Alternative ways of knowing (AWK) Jim Clark
- Re: Alternative ways of knowing (AWK) Bob Keefer
- Mental events as physical activities (was ... G. Marc Turner
- Re: Mental events as physical activit... Jim Clark
- RE: Mental events as physical activit... Paul C. Smith
- Re: Mental events as physical activit... Jeff Ricker
- RE: Mental events as physical activit... Paul C. Smith
- RE: Mental events as physical activit... Jim Clark
- RE: Mental events as physical activit... Paul C. Smith
- Re: Alternative ways of knowing (AWK) Paul Brandon