I usually don't read articles with "executive summaries" but this got air time 
on NPR this morning. On the air it sounded like we'd be better off admitting 
students based on just HS grades, but that conclusion may not be warranted, 
even using their data: 

http://www.nacacnet.org/research/research-data/nacac-research/Documents/DefiningPromise.pdf
 

The NPR story is: 

http://www.npr.org/2014/02/18/277059528/college-applicants-sweat-the-sats-perhaps-they-shouldn-t
 

I did a quick peek at their figures, and found (Figure 40) that, as I 
suspected, the combined use of grades and SAT scores predicted more variance 
than either alone. If you had to choose between them, their data shows grades a 
better predictor but that should not be surprising. I am wondering if, these 
days, there is a tighter relationship between HS grades and SAT scores (and 
general cognitive ability) at least in the US, given the tendency to 
teach-to-the-standardized test. I will never forget my shock when I saw some of 
my children's homework that looked liked IQ items, of absolutely no use to 
anyone or anything other than general-cognitive etcetera etcetera etcetera 

========================== 
John W. Kulig, Ph.D. 
Professor of Psychology 
Coordinator, Psychology Honors 
Plymouth State University 
Plymouth NH 03264 
========================== 


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=34339
or send a blank email to 
leave-34339-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to