> > The arguments for multiple KEMs are > stronger than the arguments for multiple combiners. >
X-Wing is a KEM — not a combiner. I agree there should preferably be one go-to generic combiner. Insisting that X-Wing use that generic combiner, is not dissimilar to insisting that every KEM that uses an FO transform, should use the same generic FO transform. Best, Bas
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
