On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 12:38 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz= [email protected]> wrote:
> > - This happened after a significant amount of time and was > deliberately steered toward the opposite of said result > > > My recollection and view is the exact opposite. ML-KEM key exchange was > *never* going to be RECOMMENDED=Y. > This matches my recollection as well. Rather, both pure ML-KEM and the ECC/ML-KEM hybrids were going to be Recommended=N, and then we decided late in the process (after IESG approval) to make the hybrid Recommended=Y. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
