Short motivation: Recognizing the there might be a high risk of implementation bugs or timing issues with new implementations, is a terrible reason to delay the publication of an informational documentation of a mechanism that is given status N (not recommended) in the IANA registry.
Henrick Wibell Hellström StreamSec On 2026-06-24 17:00, Joseph Salowey via Datatracker wrote:
This message initiates a new Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-mlkem[1], which defines standalone ML-KEM key establishment for TLS 1.3. The main question before the working group is: "Should the working group publish a document specifying stand alone ML-KEM?". If there is rough consensus then we will push to refine and publish the document; otherwise, we will stop discussing the draft and not progress it. Please respond to this call indicating whether you support publishing a document specifying a stand alone ML-KEM. Please refrain from further discussion on this topic as most arguments have been discussed multiple times.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
