On 2004-02-09, Chris Berry penned: > > I thought dated addresses were supposed to bypass your incoming filter > rules. I was looking through my pending directory, and I saw this in my > incoming logs: > > Date: Sun Feb 8 16:12:08 PST 2004 > From: wayne evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ~ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj: Re: Kludge howto: Thank You!! > Actn: CONFIRM (headers "^X-Spam-Status:\sYes" confirm) > (6138) > > Date: Sun Feb 8 16:12:08 PST 2004 > From: wayne evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ~ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj: Re: Kludge howto: Thank You!! > Actn: CONFIRM pending 1076285528.6841.msg > (6138) > > Any idea how to find out what happened? (oh, by the way, it defitely > was a legit message as it was in response to an earlier message from me > with a dated reply-to address) I'm using tmda-1.0
I'm pretty sure that messages to dated addresses only make it through if they don't snag on any filters first. That way, if you set up a year-long dated address and start getting spam to it, you can create a rule to deal with that. -- monique _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
