> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 20:32:05 -0600
> From: Kyle Hasselbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Kyle Hasselbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: dated confustion
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >Any message that is a reply to one of my messages should not be challenged.
> >I thought that using a dated reply-to was the way to accomplish that.
Agreed, as long as the message arrives by the date set. The outgoing
filter sets how long the dated address is good for. If you want any dated
address to be good, why not just set a really long time for the dated
address?
I haven't tried, but I would assume "dated=10Y" would suit you? I have no
idea if TMDA is 2038 compliant and I would hope it doesn't use a two digit
year, so I don't know if "dated=100Y" works. But I would think that
either would remove the requirement of your procmail filter. Other than
for the fact that you already have messages out that are expired.
"TIMEOUT
The timeout interval for 'dated' addresses. The available units are
(Y=years, M=months, w=weeks, d=days, h=hours, m=minutes, s=seconds).
Default is 5d (5 days)."
> I was just messing with this the other day. Here's a chunk from my
> .procmailrc:
>
> # If it's to a dated address, I want to give it a chance to deliver even if
> # TMDA considers the address expired. If it's still valid, don't spam check
> # it. TMDA may act on the SA headers before it realizes it's a valid dated
> # address. That is, I want valid dated addresses to deliver even if SA thinks
> # they're spam.
>
> :0 fw
> * !^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> * !^X-TMDA-
> * ^To: .*\/kyle-(exp|expires|dated|d)-.*@
> * $!? /usr/bin/tmda-check-address '$MATCH' | grep -q '^STATUS: VALID'
> | spamassassin
So if I understand this correctly, dated addresses are only handled if it
falls through the end of the incoming filters? That actually works for me
with my current configuration, but I could see possible changes in the
future making it a problem.
Would it be possible to get a rule earlier in the file "dated-address ok",
that checks that the dated-address is valid and then it does not need to
go further in the rules?
Benjamin J. Stassart
------------------------------------------------+
A great many people think they are thinking |
when they are merely rearranging their |
prejudices |
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
