-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 05:44:58PM -0800, Chris Berry wrote:
>Any message that is a reply to one of my messages should not be challenged. > >I thought that using a dated reply-to was the way to accomplish that. I was just messing with this the other day. Here's a chunk from my .procmailrc: # If it's to a dated address, I want to give it a chance to deliver even if # TMDA considers the address expired. If it's still valid, don't spam check # it. TMDA may act on the SA headers before it realizes it's a valid dated # address. That is, I want valid dated addresses to deliver even if SA thinks # they're spam. :0 fw * !^X-Spam-Status: Yes * !^X-TMDA- * ^To: .*\/kyle-(exp|expires|dated|d)-.*@ * $!? /usr/bin/tmda-check-address '$MATCH' | grep -q '^STATUS: VALID' | spamassassin This is near the end of my .tmda/filters/incoming: # # At this point, we know the message is NOT on my whitelist, # and it's also not on any blacklist. Procmail is set up to # filter the message through SpamAssassin only when it's not # to a tagged address. Therefore, the following rule will not # match a tagged addressed mail, and those will be evaluated # based on their tags. # headers 'X-Spam-Status: No' ok Hope this helps (and suggestions are welcome). - -- Kyle Hasselbacher Honesty is the best policy, [EMAIL PROTECTED] but insanity is a better defense. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAJvEl10sofiqUxIQRAh0yAJ0aNUc16E27DVJSQcQn9sZ+R3lZ0QCeKdOR FClm0Ui258Ybv35A0hKeqH0= =Jtpw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
