> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 21:01:44 -0800 > From: Chris Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: dated confustion
> Here's my outgoing filter: > > to-file /home/virtual/users/chris_berry/.tmda/lists/mailing_lists bare > to * tag Reply-To dated envelope dated=10d from bare Do you need dated=10d for both? Otherwise the Reply-To will default to 5 days and the envelope will be 10 days. > The reply was sent with 20 minutes of the message. What am I missing? Either way a reply within 20 minutes should work. > Date: Sun Feb 8 16:12:08 PST 2004 > From: wayne evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ~ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj: Re: Kludge howto: Thank You!! > Actn: CONFIRM (headers "^X-Spam-Status:\sYes" confirm) > (6138) % echo "1076716395" | perl -e 'my $var = localtime <>; print "$var\n";' Fri Feb 13 15:53:15 2004 This confirms that the Reply-To is using the default 5 days. However, as I believe Monique stated it shows that it is matching your "X-Spam-Status: Yes" rule. Kyle showed one way to avoid running SpamAssasin on a dated address. That should solve your particular problem. You don't need to use procmail, just however you are calling SpamAssasin, don't do it if the dated address is valid. The TODO list item will be a cleaner solution. The Message-ID method in FAQ 5.5 is another possible solution to replies. Benjamin J. Stassart ------------------------------------------------+ A great many people think they are thinking | when they are merely rearranging their | prejudices | _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
