Stephen Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jason R. Mastaler wrote: >> Stephen Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Jason, >>> >>> Do you have any objection to the logging and sendmail invocation changes >>> in this patch? If not, I'll go ahead and test them (should be fun; guess >>> I need a pure proxy setup too!) and check them in. >> >> Nay on the sendmail change, but I'm fine with the logging change, >> except that I honestly don't really understand what it gives us over >> the current behavior. Do you think it's useful/necessary? > > Well, it cuts down on the log size a little bit, which could make it > easier to read. Perhaps somebody who wants to analyze the logfile for > per-sender stats etc. wants a small log file. > > I guess it does allow persistent logging to be enabled without writing > people's password AUTH data to the log file, which might be useful. > > But I personally only enable -d when there's a problem, so adding -L > wouldn't make a difference to me.
Okay, so go ahead and check it in. If you could beef up the help output though that would be good. "Turn on logging prints." doesn't really explain much. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([email protected]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
