Hi, The format I use for MD5 sums is the standard one. Every other project I know uses this format, so I think if anything this user needs to adjust his preferences ;) However, if there's a standard or spec somewhere that mandates we use md5 -r (reverse output format), then sure, someone point me to it and I'll follow that spec when signing releases.
Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics >-----Original Message----- >From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 5:26 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads > >Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Andy Mudrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Date: 10 August 2004 00:57:44 BST >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Subject: md5 sums for jakarta downloads >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I noticed that your MD5 sums on your website are not all formatted >>> correctly. I specifically downloaded the Tomcat 5.0.27 MD5 file, and >>> found this out. Not that it's a big deal or anything like that, but >>> it'd be good to have the MD5 properly formatted, that is the MD5 sum >>> and then the file name... > >I am not sure that is a good idea: >+++ >-bash-2.05b$ openssl md5 toto >MD5(toto)= efd6b079984c77cd80254ff266e9ab43 >+++ > >And looking in the Jakarta "Binary downloads" I have found that a lot of >other >MD5 file are using the Tomcat format. > >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Andy Mudrak >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
