BSD md5:
> md5 commons-collections-3.1.jar MD5 (commons-collections-3.1.jar) = d1dcb0fbee884bb855bb327b8190af36
while the GNU md5 script generates the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jars]$ md5sum commons-collections-3.1.jar d1dcb0fbee884bb855bb327b8190af36 commons-collections-3.1.jar
And maven just generates and uses: d1dcb0fbee884bb855bb327b8190af36
Yes, the nice thing about BSD md5 is that the -r can be used to make it look like the GNU md5sum output, it would probably be good if we started to use this as it will be more prevalent and possibly is the closest one can get to a standard:
> md5 -r commons-collections-3.1.jar d1dcb0fbee884bb855bb327b8190af36 commons-collections-3.1.jar
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
This is the md5 output generated by BSD md5 and not necessarily a "standard", GNU md5sum generates a different format that is not "standard" as well. For maven, just the checksum portion of the content is stored in the file.
It would be nice if there was a standard in this area, but I have yet to see one in the internet community. We have the same problem with generating md5 checksums for the maven repository at the moment.
-Mark
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi, The format I use for MD5 sums is the standard one. Every other project I know uses this format, so I think if anything this user needs to adjust his preferences ;) However, if there's a standard or spec somewhere that mandates we use md5 -r (reverse output format), then sure, someone point me to it and I'll follow that spec when signing releases.
Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics
-----Original Message----- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 5:26 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andy Mudrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 10 August 2004 00:57:44 BST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: md5 sums for jakarta downloads
Hi,
I noticed that your MD5 sums on your website are not all formatted correctly. I specifically downloaded the Tomcat 5.0.27 MD5 file,
and
found this out. Not that it's a big deal or anything like that, but it'd be good to have the MD5 properly formatted, that is the MD5 sum and then the file name...
I am not sure that is a good idea: +++ -bash-2.05b$ openssl md5 toto MD5(toto)= efd6b079984c77cd80254ff266e9ab43 +++
And looking in the Jakarta "Binary downloads" I have found that a lot
of
other MD5 file are using the Tomcat format.
Thanks,
Andy Mudrak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Mark Diggory Software Developer Harvard MIT Data Center http://www.hmdc.harvard.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
