Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Well, as always, when there's an established practice I'd like a
stronger reason than "it would probably be good" to change it ;)  I see
what you mean, but I don't know that the GNU md5 is any more prevalent
than the BSD md5 or vice versa...

Maven format is the one we should use in Jakarta ;-)

Probably the discussion must be moved to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that the whole jakarta uses the same format and that we write a description of the format to use somewhere (if not yet done).


Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark R. Diggory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 9:52 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads

For example here are the outputs of the various signing tools we use at
this time:

BSD md5:


md5 commons-collections-3.1.jar

MD5 (commons-collections-3.1.jar) = d1dcb0fbee884bb855bb327b8190af36

while the GNU md5 script generates the following:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] jars]$ md5sum commons-collections-3.1.jar
d1dcb0fbee884bb855bb327b8190af36  commons-collections-3.1.jar

And maven just generates and uses:
d1dcb0fbee884bb855bb327b8190af36

Yes, the nice thing about BSD md5 is that the -r can be used to make it
look like the GNU md5sum output, it would probably be good if we

started

to use this as it will be more prevalent and possibly is the closest

one

can get to a standard:


md5 -r commons-collections-3.1.jar

d1dcb0fbee884bb855bb327b8190af36 commons-collections-3.1.jar


Mark R. Diggory wrote:


This is the md5 output generated by BSD md5 and not necessarily a
"standard", GNU md5sum generates a different format that is not
"standard" as well. For maven, just the checksum portion of the

content

is stored in the file.

It would be nice if there was a standard in this area, but I have yet

to

see one in the internet community. We have the same problem with
generating md5 checksums for the maven repository at the moment.

-Mark

Shapira, Yoav wrote:


Hi,
The format I use for MD5 sums is the standard one.  Every other

project

I know uses this format, so I think if anything this user needs to
adjust his preferences ;)  However, if there's a standard or spec
somewhere that mandates we use md5 -r (reverse output format), then
sure, someone point me to it and I'll follow that spec when signing
releases.

Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics




-----Original Message-----
From: jean-frederic clere

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 5:26 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads

Pier Fumagalli wrote:


Begin forwarded message:



From: Andy Mudrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 August 2004 00:57:44 BST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: md5 sums for jakarta downloads

Hi,



I noticed that your MD5 sums on your website are not all

formatted

correctly. I specifically downloaded the Tomcat 5.0.27 MD5 file,


and


found this out. Not that it's a big deal or anything like that,

but

it'd be good to have the MD5 properly formatted, that is the MD5

sum

and then the file name...


I am not sure that is a good idea:
+++
-bash-2.05b$ openssl md5  toto
MD5(toto)= efd6b079984c77cd80254ff266e9ab43
+++

And looking in the Jakarta "Binary downloads" I have found that a

lot


of


other
MD5 file are using the Tomcat format.




Thanks,



Andy Mudrak

[EMAIL PROTECTED]







---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Mark Diggory
Software Developer
Harvard MIT Data Center
http://www.hmdc.harvard.edu

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to