I'm not sure if this will solve it or is even accurate - but probably worth
you checking out.  Specifically, look at msterjev's post re use of
URLClassLoader near the bottom of the thread: 
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Programming_Languages/Java/Q_207
10542.html 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday 27 October 2004 14:03
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: GlobalNamingResouces used by other GlobalNamingResources
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> Yeah, Steve's advice on classloading is right on the mark... I don't
> have time to check this out in depth, but I'd be surprised if he's
> wrong.  com.foo loaded from common/lib is not the same as 
> com.foo loaded
> from WEB-INF/lib.
> 
> Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
>  
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Steve Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:58 AM
> >To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> >Subject: RE: GlobalNamingResouces used by other GlobalNamingResources
> >
> >Sorry - can't answer that one for sure.  Does look a bit strange.
> >
> >I could only guess that it might be to do with classloading? 
>  I seem to
> >remember that a class "abc.def.MyClass" loaded by classloader "A" is
> deemed
> >to be different to the same class "abc.def.MyClass" loaded by
> classloader
> >"B", so I would guess that this might lead to casting problems.  I
> haven't
> >used JNDI much apart from in the context of DBCP, so I'm not sure
> exactly
> >how it works - could it maybe be using a different classloader to the
> one
> >loading your servlet classes?
> >
> >Then again that could be complete rubbish :)
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Roland Carlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Wednesday 27 October 2004 13:41
> >> To: TomcatUsers
> >> Subject: Sv: GlobalNamingResouces used by other 
> GlobalNamingResources
> >>
> >>
> >> Hello Steve!
> >>
> >> I have done some trial and error and come to the following
> >> (if not somewhat
> >> shaky) conclusion.
> >>
> >> If I make the call to the datasource in the consturctor of my
> >> object it will
> >> fail, since the caller is the server itself and it has no context.
> >>
> >> If I make the call to the datasource as a method after have
> >> looked up my
> >> object and retrived as a "user" it will run in the context of the
> user
> >> (web-app) and therefore work. Perhaps Yoav can confirm this?
> >>
> >> So, I manage to get my object...but get a strange class cast
> error....
> >>
> >> This code:
> >>
> >> System.out.println(o);
> >> se.alfamoving.file.db.FileIdGenerator fg =
> >> (se.alfamoving.file.db.FileIdGenerator) o;
> >>
> >> Gives this output:
> >>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> java.lang.ClassCastException <snip/>
> >>
> >>
> >> But I'll guess that I spelled badly somewhere :-/ The happy
> >> moments never
> >> seems to last :-)
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for your time and effort!
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Roland Carlsson
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Den 04-10-27 14.28, skrev "Steve Kirk"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> > OK now I see your problem.  I have the same issue.  I've
> >> worked around it
> >> > with a bit of a hack I'm afraid, and just used the MySQL
> >> non-jdbc solution.
> >> > As you say I will pay the price for this sin later, if I
> >> ever need to swap
> >> > database.  However I've taken a view that for my specific
> >> situation, this is
> >> > unlikely in the medium term.  So instead of investing time
> >> in making the
> >> > code completely portable to another database, I've 
> invested time in
> >> > mitigating the impact by genericising my code so that there
> >> is only one
> >> > place I will need to make changes.  (Essentially, I've
> >> beanified all my
> >> > database tables so that I have a single method that creates
> >> rows in any
> >> > table in the database and returns the ID).
> >> >
> >> > I think portability and re-use are worth investing time and
> >> effort in, but
> >> > there is a limit to that, and sometimes, you need to make
> >> compromises and
> >> > move on, otherwise you can spend days trying to work around
> >> a problem that
> >> > might never happen.
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Roland Carlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> Sent: Wednesday 27 October 2004 13:03
> >> >> To: TomcatUsers
> >> >> Subject: Sv: GlobalNamingResouces used by other
> >> GlobalNamingResources
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Steve and thanks for you answer.
> >> >>
> >> >> Try the following scenario.
> >> >>
> >> >> The problem is to get back the primary key when doing an
> >> >> insert. Say that
> >> >> you have a master/slave relation between two tables.
> >> >>
> >> >> You insert a row into master. Then you are going to insert
> >> a few rows
> >> >> connected to the master into slave. How do you know the
> >> >> id-number of your
> >> >> master?
> >> >>
> >> >> I know that mysql has a non-jdbc soloution for this but since
> >> >> one of our
> >> >> general design goals are portable code...... So, we have
> >> >> desided to take the
> >> >> same apporach as Object-Relational Bridge. We created our own
> >> >> id-generator
> >> >> to handle the problem. But its has created a new set of
> >> >> problems now when we
> >> >> are going to use multiple web-apps and (in a not so distant
> >> >> future) mutiple
> >> >> servers.
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards
> >> >> Roland Carlsson
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Den 04-10-27 13.48, skrev "Steve Kirk"
> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> >>
> >> >>> sorry, can't answer specific Q on whether you can access
> >> >> datasource from
> >> >>> generator.  but it sounds like you are trying to uniquely
> >> >> ID rows in a
> >> >>> database?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> if so then the simplest way seems to be to use
> >> >> auto_increment fields and let
> >> >>> the database handle it.  or are you saying that that isn'y
> >> >> working - is this
> >> >>> what you mean by "not supporting the database-generated
> >> >> id-numbers"?  if so
> >> >>> please say more about why its not working.  what database?
> >> >> code sample?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential 
> business communication, and may contain information that is 
> confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is 
> intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, 
> and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by 
> anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, 
> please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer 
> system and notify the sender.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to