Good question!, that I would even make broader: In OWL2 it seems we have mainly:
- Functional-Style - RDF/XML - TURTLE - Manchester - OWL/XML In TBC-ME 3.2 we have: - RDF/XML Abbreviated - RDF/XML - TURTLE - N3 - N-TRIPLE Resulting in questions: - will RDF/XML Abrev. and/or N3 or N-TRIPLE disappear some point in time? - will Functional-Style and/or OWL/XML and/or Manchester be in some point in time? (Manchester apart from current input boxes) Michel -----Original Message----- From: Peter Bruhn Andersen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: woensdag 18 november 2009 14:42 To: [email protected] Subject: [tbc-users] OWL 2 XML Serializtion When can we expect to be able to save an ontology as a XML file using the new OWL/XML serialization option? I haven't found this to be a part of the Topbraid Composer ME 3.2 version. Did I mis something? Regards, Peter Bruhn Andersen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=. This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=.
