Hi Jeremy You asked: > So, I am intrigued ... do you want OWL/XML format because you want to > read it? Because you have other tools that work with OWL/XML but not > with RDF/XML? or ... > what is the underlying requirement driving this request? > My personal reason for wanting TopQuadrant to provide us with this feature is to let me reach out to the many who still sees no reason whatsoever to use RDF and/ OWL. Letting those of us who can develop ontologies using OWL while we provide the xml community with a vesrion they understand seems to me to be a good solution. This way we can introduce semantic technologies step by step without having a non-productive battle between XML and RDF communities.
A case in point: Currently the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation is developing there own xml based ontologies. Quite stupid but nevertheless a fact of the real world. I would like to be able to persuade them to at least use the xsd for OWL/XML to make there ontologies compatible with the world of linked data. And I hope I can count on TopQuadrant to provide me with the tools. Regards, Peter Bruhn Andersen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=.
