Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote: > > Good question!, that I would even make broader: > > >
I was intrigued as to why? The exchange format between semantic web tools is RDF/XML. TopBraid Suite supports this. This is what is required for interoperation with other semantic web tools. We also support some others. Our choices are based on what we think will be helpful for many of our users. I think also several of the TopBraid developers feel more comfortable with n3/turtle, and, since we, from time to time, actually have to read this files, having formats that the TopBraid developers can read more easily is very helpful. So, I am intrigued ... do you want OWL/XML format because you want to read it? Because you have other tools that work with OWL/XML but not with RDF/XML? or ... what is the underlying requirement driving this request? Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=.
