JJZolx;549042 Wrote: > I think you're right. For a standalone player, using Squeezebox Server > probably doesn't make a whole lot of sense. But it's established > software - that's how it's always worked, and you go with what you > know. > > Probably the biggest problem with the Touch is that someone got over > ambitious with it. First, it tries to be and do too many different > things. The larger miscalculation, though, was thinking that the > hardware would be able to reliably run both the server and player. A > Touch II, with more memory and more CPU power would work fine. If the > Squeezebox line is kept alive I'd expect to see such a device fairly > soon, possibly also fixing some of the other shortcomings that might > not have been feasible several years ago when the Touch was designed, > such as having a larger screen.
I would be happy with it running its internal server (as its suppost to be able to do) but it cant even manage that most of the time. I just dont get why it cant do a simple thing like read from a USB drive without throwing a fit. -- Dave (Northumberland) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dave (Northumberland)'s Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37753 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=78969 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
