Eli Carter wrote: > On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Christian Boos wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to reach a decision for ticket #5572 (Roadmap Progress bar >> errors when using custom Workflow). Again a bug report that turned into >> a new feature ;-) >> .. >> A simpler fix would be possible (one group for closed tickets, a second >> for all the other states), but as I said above I think it's just at the >> appropriate level of complexity, matching the workflow configurability. >> > > Not only is it possible, but I committed that fix to trunk a while back > http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/5842 (and re-diffed the feature patch > afterwards). 2-line change. :) >
Well, sorry that went unnoticed in all this discussion ;-) > I do think the feature is useful. With the new workflow, you could easily > have three groups: closed, in-work, and everything else. (As in fact, you > have in the workflows/basic-workflow.ini example.) > Based on that use case, I agree we need a wildcard capability. > Yeah, I updated the basic-workflow.ini sample so that it illustrates the '*' group. > The r6000 diff still has a reference to '!'. > > Otherwise, the patch looks ok to me. > Fixed also the above in r6011. -- Christian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
