-On [20080513 07:29], Christian Boos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >Well, IIRC, only asmodai and you shared the opinion that those >changesets weren't a problem, others were inclined to think more like >me.
And thus automatically your idea wins? Because that's what it now looks like, especially after revising TracL10N to present your workflow. >So I don't see the problem in presenting my arguments again, in a more >structured way, on a discussion list were the topic can reach a wider >audience (translators and other Trac contributors). After you stumbling onto IRC to throw a 'noise' argument into my face, arguing it on all fronts and now committing and changing things to already reflect your point of view I call bullshit that you now want to 'present it again in a more structured way'. You have an idea in your head and you just want to enforce it even after I said I would look into it. Have fun, good luck and best of wishes coordinating all the translations. I can spend my time on more constructive things. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B If Winter comes, can Spring be far behind..? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
