Tamara,
Re-pricers are not covered entities under the
law. They are your business associates
however. And as such, you will have to contractually make them live up to
the privacy and security provisions.
In addition, since the 837 is defined in the law as
a request from a provider to a health plan for payment (or encounter reporting),
this also makes the TPA (re-pricer) not required, per HIPAA, to
accept an 837. That being said, you can always switch to a different
re-pricing company who is more with the program!
Hope this helps.
Jim Kelly
TPA Computer Corp.
----- Original Message -----
********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ===================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited. |
Title: Message
- TPA question Kelley_McCarthy
- 837D IG understanding Bill
- RE: 837D IG understanding Tom Drinkard
- RE: TPA question Rachel Foerster
- TPA question Havenhill-Jacobs, Tamara
- RE: TPA question James Kelly
- RE: TPA question Marcallee Jackson
- RE: TPA question Kurt Hartmann
- RE: TPA question Tucci-Kaufhold, Ruth A.
- Re: TPA question James Kelly
- RE: TPA question Tucci-Kaufhold, Ruth A.
- Re: TPA question James Kelly
- Re: TPA question TDefino
- RE: TPA question Terry . Christensen
- Re: TPA question Jan Root
