Karl,
     I'd better add that part 2 applies to everything.  Part 5 is was intended
for radiators portable phones etc but the fcc seemed happy to accept
computer stuff for an experimental license.  It did feel a bit silly saying
na to antenna and TX power in uWatts.

         Regards Ian.

In message "labelling of prototypes in US", you write:

> Karl,
>      from the look of your address you are an importer.  I'd suggest looking
> at FCC Part 2 section 2.1204.  Alternatively apply for an experimental 
> license under Part 5.  I think that the FCC prefer the experimental license
> method.  It costs about $50 and they take visa etc.
> 
>            Regards Ian.
> 
> In message "labeling of prototypes in US", you write:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > can anyone advice me about the labeling requirements
> > of equipment that has to be registered by FCC but isn't
> > yet ?
> > 
> > Some years ago when I had deal with this question the 
> > first time, I was informed that one has to use the 
> > following text:
> > "This device has not been approved by the Federal 
> > Communications Commission. This device is not, and may
> > not be, offered for sale or lease, or sold or leased
> > until the approval of the FCC has been obtained."
> > 
> > Is this information up to date ? Are there any require-
> > ments concerning material and design of the label ?
> > 
> > Thank you very much in advance.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Karl
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > []   Karl-Heinz Doerfler
> > |    
> > |    ELSA GmbH             Tel.: +49/241-606-4656
> > |    Sonnenweg 11          Fax:  +49/241-606-1199
> > |    D-52070 Aachen        E-mail: [email protected]
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> >                                                         
>                                                      

Reply via email to