Jon,
Thank you for your reply. I've looked up 2.805 & 2.806 (dated 6/96)
and there was what I had been curious about.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: labelling of prototypes in US
Author: [email protected] at INTERNET
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 9/12/97 4:59 PM
Dear Ron,
Keep reading down in your rules. FCC 47 CFR Part 2.805 and 2.806 cover
verified and DoC digital devices. Similiar rules apply to them. Note
also that the FCC issued a R&O changing this area to loosen it up last
year, so make sure you have a current copy of the rules or pull down the
report and order from the FCC web site.
Jon D. Curtis, PE
Curtis-Straus LLC [email protected]
One-Stop Laboratory for EMC, Product Safety and Telecom
527 Great Road voice (508) 486-8880
Littleton, MA 01460 fax (508) 486-8828
http://world.std.com/~csweb
On Thu, 11 Sep 1997 [email protected] wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
> This query is in the applicability of FCC rule 2.803. Hans had
> provided the Part 2 reference which caused me to look it up again.
> This has raised a question for me.
>
> According to 2.803, "... device which has not been granted type
> approval, type acceptance, certification or notification, will not be
> deemed an offer for sale if such advertising contains, and the display
> is accompanied by, conspicuous notice worded as follows:"
>
> As verification and declaration of conformity are not present in this
> paragraph, is equipment that is subject to Verification (2.902) or
> Declaration of Conformity (2.906) exempt from this labelling requirement?
>
> Any opinions on this subject would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Best regards,
> Ron Pickard
> [email protected]
>
