Joe,
 
 You asked:
 >Regarding your remark about the type B plug, I agree.  However, this
 >type of plug is completely inappropriate for most ITE telecom gear, such
 >as a modem. The Type B plug is not a practical solution to this problem.
 
 I quite agree with you in that type B plugs are inappropriate for almost all 
 typical applications. However, I thought I'd throw the type B plug comment out 
 and see what came back.
 
 >Regarding your closing comment about the law being "cut and dry," it is
 >still unclear to me what your interpretation of the situation is.  Could
 >you please clarify what you believe the options are for addressing the
 >national conditions that Sweden and Norway impose for clause 6.2.1.2?
 >
 >Roger Magnusen's response (posted earlier on treg) seemed to confirm my
 >interpretation.  Do you agree with this interpretation, or do you have
 >a different view?
 
 I agree completely with Roger's response and see no other easy alternatives.
 
 Best regards,
 Ron Pickard
 [email protected]

Reply via email to