So it's all about "you", then. ;-)
______
Bill
...... Original Message .......
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:45:02 -0400 Scandals & Animals
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It wouldn't change the fact that various models are discussed. But if I
>think the 680 stuff is irrelevant to me and wastes my time, this would
>allow me to concentrate only on the 650 and 700 stuff and the general and
>all stuff. Everything else would still be here for anyone who wants to
>read it.
>
>
>
>
>--------------------
>"In my lifetime, we've gone from Eisenhower to George W. Bush, from John
>Kennedy to Albert Gore. Now if that is evolution, I believe that in about
>12 years, we're gonna be voting for plants."
>
>--Comedian Lewis Black
>
>...... Original Message .......
>On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:49:38 -0400 Bill Sheehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>>I respectfully disagree and decline. I prefer our quiet jumble than
>>a bunch of self-appointed Linneauses creating artificial categories.
>>
>>-- Bill
>>
>>On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Scandals & Animals wrote:
>>
>>> How about we start including in the subject line, right at the
>>> beginning,
>>> the model of Treo that the post is about? Question about a 680? The
>>> proper subject line would be "680: <remainder of subject>." Same
>>> goes for
>>> the 650, 700, etc. A general question could be preceeded by
>>> "general" or
>>> "all."
>>>
>>> Howboutit?
