Well, My email program doesn't have an "Emergency" flag (I question the wisdom of using email for emergency purposes anyway) or a "Highest Importance" one either, just Importance:High (which it was to the sender) or Flag for Follow-up which he indicated he intended to do. He's not responsible for how anyone else sets up there email systems. Personally I find the reaction to his choices petty, controlling and possibly discriminatory but am happy to extend equal tolerance to all parties for the sake of the great Treo information found here. Speaking of which, any suggestions on how to sync my 680 with my new Eee PC 8G? I think JPilot was mentioned so I'm going to check that out now.
Thanks! On Dec 23, 2007 3:15 PM, Craig Froehle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh Man! Give the guy a break. It's his choice to flag and your > > choice to delete. > > That's not the issue (of course, if it *was* such a simple issue, no > one would be upset by spam, would they?). > > Many people (including me) have their email systems set up to take > specific actions when an email of "highest priority" comes in. In my > case, my phone gets texted and the email is forwarded to a second > account I check more frequently. Is all that actually necessary for > something that truly isn't "highest priority?" I've yet to see a post > from Vishal that I think most would consider truly an emergency. > > Understanding that your actions have effects on others is a sign of > social maturity. Accepting that others may not want you to behave the > way you do, and adjusting your actions when so requested (assuming > it's a reasonable request) is a sign of social conscience. This list > appreciates both. > > Thanks. > - mod > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
