I think there's a way of asking. Why is it a big deal with a message marked as high importance? If there's something, then explain it. I think if it is with explanation then something can be understood. But if someone just feels like saying so without any basis then how can that happen? I had used abbreviations last time and people said it was difficult to encode it. It did not digest to me fully but I still have made the change. You can go through my mails for that matter. I was told by you to use different subjects for different topics. I did it as it was explained. I saw the same thing happening again in the group. The subject is different and the content has changed. You have also replied to a similar post.
What I'm saying here is that in a group there should be rules, but not one-sided. If I want rules in a group, I can't be an exception to it. Vishal From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alli Sent: 23 December 2007 19:39 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Treo] To Vishal Calm down. Someone asked you nicely to stop marking your messages urgent. It's not a big deal. Vishal Sheth wrote: > There's another thing that I'd like to point out. People had in the past > been advising not to do this and that and stuff. Why can't they just take > care for their matters? Someone was saying not to use abbreviations; someone > was talking about subject of the mail and its content and now not to put > high priority flags. What the hell is this? Why are there people discussing > different content in the same subject? Where is the code of conduct? I know > what I'm going. People convey their message in their own way. If you don't > know then ask rather than just pointing fingers. Remember, when you point a > finger at other person, others are pointing at you. This is a free forum > which I've joined. I understand there are rules, but then that should be for > all. > > > > Vishal [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
