I understand your problem. Are all your 5 fingers of the hand same? No. All the fingers have their own priorities and functions. The 1st finger would not know the functions of the last tiny finger.
Why do you have a preferential system to manage you high priority mails? Because, you have set priorities according to what you want to work 1st or other needs. What if someone who has an urgent mail for you, would send you not marking urgent? You want be able to reply or work on the same on priority. In this case even if you have set a system for your better functioning, you would not be able to as you did not get the mail in high priority. It would get treated as the normal once. What I am saying here is that priority of one is not necessarily priority of the other. Vishal PS: I've said I'll not be sending mails with high priority. From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Froehle Sent: 24 December 2007 03:46 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Treo] To Vishal > Oh Man! Give the guy a break. It's his choice to flag and your > choice to delete. That's not the issue (of course, if it *was* such a simple issue, no one would be upset by spam, would they?). Many people (including me) have their email systems set up to take specific actions when an email of "highest priority" comes in. In my case, my phone gets texted and the email is forwarded to a second account I check more frequently. Is all that actually necessary for something that truly isn't "highest priority?" I've yet to see a post from Vishal that I think most would consider truly an emergency. Understanding that your actions have effects on others is a sign of social maturity. Accepting that others may not want you to behave the way you do, and adjusting your actions when so requested (assuming it's a reasonable request) is a sign of social conscience. This list appreciates both. Thanks. - mod [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
