Hi N I am really pleased for you (and I really mean that)
If you have been satisfied then you have had far better customer satisfaction than I have, and I genuinely hope it continues. All I can say is that I have had 4 different models over a number of years and one way or another, have been disappointed with each and every one of them. Over the years I have stuck with Palm because 1/. - it was primarily a PDA with the convenience of a phone (for all its faults) 2/. - the OS and apps were far better than anything else available (tried an O2 XDA with Pocket Windows briefly and they weren't in the same street) 3/. - most importantly - there seemed to be no viable alternative After my experience with the 650 repair I vowed that I would never put another penny in Palms coffers but the TomTom deal finally swung it (little did I know the battery would only last a day) Therefore I have to ask myself, was it the fact that there was no viable alternative the reason that Palm seemed to consistently screw up what worked fine and was it a deliberate attempt to keep us in the loop for upgrades or was it merely due to gross incompetence on the part of the designers who insisted in starting with a blank sheet for each new model. You decide! What I do know is they defiantly did not have a policy of 'don't fix what ain't broke' Now I haven't come back into this group to bash Palm. All I have done is to do a bit of research and at the same time, tell the truth according to my experiences. Now when someone tries to close me down (as Ali did) then that is red rag to a bull. I will rear up and tell it like I see it, consequently the re-titling of the thread. If this group is all about preaching the Palm Gospel to the converted, then obviously there is no place for me here and I will leave you all in peace. If it about sharing ones experience with Palm over the years (for good or bad, and for all to see), then I am happy to pass on mine. Your call moderator! Kind Regards Jomo P.S - and Big Thanks to Roger for giving me an alternative. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nico Sent: 07 June 2008 16:57 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Treo] DON'T BUY A PALM PHONE! I am sorry to inform you I have been using my 680 for almost 1.5 years now without any issue. But hey, your entitled to your own opinion... N. On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Jomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:jomo%40johnnymo.co.uk> > wrote: > Why? > > It is a Treo issue > > In my experience, each and everyone of them has been lacking someway > or another - and what's more, I have parted up with a lot of money to > suffer their CRAP! > > My advice to anyone visiting this site to gather information as to > whether to buy a Palm phone. > > DON'T! > > The phones are CRAP and the company is CRAP, and their after service > is CRAP! > > Echoing Roger and wishing them a speedy demise > > The truth needs to be told! > > Jomo (off out but happy to continued this thread later) unless I am > moderated LOL > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > Behalf Of Alli > Sent: 07 June 2008 15:50 > To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Treo] Treo Yahoo Group > > Since this is the Treo Yahoo group, can we please get back to Treo > issues and stop discussing, iPhones, Blackberries, and any non Treo device/issue? > > I know there are plenty of other groups out there for these other topics. > And in the meanwhile, please feel free to continue any non Treo > discussion off list if someone has questions about a non Treo issue. > > Thanks! > > -- > Alli > ASCII to ASCII, DOS to DOS. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
