In my experience, WM5 on a treo is 10 times better than on a Motorola Q or the PPC 6700.
I've only had one freakout in a month vs at least a few unexpected resets on the 700p. YMMV -----Original Message----- From: "Harold M. Goldner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: 7/9/08 11:15 PM Subject: Re: [Treo] Treo 800w My issue with WinMo is that it is antithetical to the entire idea of a PDA, which is the key aspect that makes a 'smartphone' smart. Palm let's you do things simply and quickly. No version of windows does simple or quick. Harold ..... Original Message ....... On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT) "Vishal Sheth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have who wanted to try palm, they did it & they are not even thinking of >switching to WM. They feel why they did not use palm for so long? They also >agree that palm os is much powerful than WM. If they would have updated their >os from time to time then WM would not have ever come up. >Alli, who phone of WM did you try? with which service? >Vishal Sheth > >-----Original Message----- >From: Alli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thursday, Jul 10, 2008 1:34 am >Subject: Re: [Treo] Treo 800w >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [email protected] > > > >I'd prefer Samsung or Sony. HTC does alright by Palm, but the hardware > doesn't live up to the os. The Tilt is awful, and the Diamond debut > was...horrible. > > Jeffrey Kaplan wrote: >> Hello, Alli. On 7/9/2008 3:40 PM you said: >> >>> I don't like the Touch. I'm really not keen on HTC at all. I *like* the >>> new Sprint Instinct, but it has no sync abilities. >> >> Why not? IMO, if you must go WinMob, then HTC is the brand you want. >> btw, doesn't HTC make the hardware for Palm? >> > >-- > Alli > > Justify my text? I'm sorry but it has no excuse. > > > > > ___ Harold M. Goldner www.goldnerlaw.com Sent from my Palm Trëo 755p ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
