Ditto... I thought at first that it would be a "bummer" without a card slot, but it has all been fine just as a USB drive.
Jim (Via Palm Pre) On Apr 12, 2010 4:31 PM, Jim O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: Yeah, I thought so, too. However, in 10 months with a Pre I have not once said, "Damn, if I only had more storage space." I have found more versatility with the Pre as a USB drive, than I ever had with my Treo card slot. Jim O'Sullivan Creating Healthier Lives http://www.FeelingYoungAndHealthy.com --- On Mon, 4/12/10, Toni Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: From: Toni Roberts <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Treo 680 or 750 To: [email protected] Date: Monday, April 12, 2010, 4:23 PM Thanks. No storage card slot? That's a big one for me. -- Be well, Toni Roberts Atlanta/Marietta/Smyrna/Vinings Blog: http://touchprints.blogspot.com/ On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Craig Froehle <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, trotter <[email protected]<m.nuttall%40ukonline.co.uk>> > wrote: > > Better to wait and see if anything comes up which suits me better > > than buy something that is lesser of a device than the Treo 680. > > I'm sorry, but that's just a silly thing to say. I've owned three > Palm OS Treos and a Centro (loved them all) and can compare them quite > directly to the Pre, which I've had now for about 10 months. To claim > that the Pre is "lesser of a device" than any of the Treos is absurd > as it flies in the face of the fact that the Pre can do many, many > things that Palm OS Treos can not (multitask, full web experience, > sync with online & social media PIM, run true 3D games, full GPS > functionality, automated online backup, etc.). In contrast, there's > nearly nothing any Palm OS Treo does that the Pre cannot (apart from > an SD slot...whoopie-do). And even if it can't _today_, webOS is > adding functionality pretty much daily, whereas nobody is developing > for Palm OS anymore. Also, the Pre can run many Palm OS apps, whereas > the reverse is not true. > > So, you might be right in believing that moving to a Pre isn't the > right thing for you at this time, but please don't spew such nonsense > as claiming that the Pre is an overall inferior device to a Treo. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
