I completely understand the issue. I'm raising issue with only one of the
points in your original argument is all, and nothing more, which is about
being unaudited. As I've explained, that's not a JavaScript-specific issue.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... davesamcdxv
- [Trisquel-users] JS on websites: less about visi... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be... jason
- [Trisquel-users] Not being able to vet s... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaSc... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... lloyd
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... danigaritarojas
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... Michał Masłowski
