Pedantics alone. Why on Earth would you suggest releasing it as free software? It seems more and more than in this community, people are avoiding *payment* more than wanting *freedom*. The two aren't the same thing, and in the case of Windows, it's just not the philosophy they build on.
Important comparison: Capitalism vs. Socialism vs. Communism. Countries like the US love to endlessly circlejerk over Capitalism being somehow "right", and that every Communist country should be destroyed, every Socialist converted somehow. That's insane, and there's absolutely zero reason for everyone to be doing the same thing, following the same principles. Trisquel is free. GNU is free. Linux is Free. That's enough. Let's just keep working on that, and getting free OPTIONS in other realms. No need to force the non-free into freedom. Same thing as when the US decides it needs to force "liberty" upon countries that never asked for it, and fall shortly after we impose our ideals. On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 1:29:48 PM <shiret...@web.de> wrote: > "That's like suggesting > Microsoft should open-source windows." > > Who wants to do that? > Of course we would suggest releasing it as *free software*... >
