"Art is nonfunctional data that isn't software" - Many would say you're entirely wrong on that, especially considering software itself could be considered art.
On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 5:59:49 PM <m...@jadedfs.net> wrote: > Market data just proves that selling proprietary software works, not that > it's the only way to make a profit off of software. > Non-free blobs? Not that I'm aware of. Doom 3 is Free Software, but the art > assets aren't. Art is nonfunctional data that isn't software. > And when did I say that you have to agree with me? You can believe that > proprietary software is fantastical for all I care. > I'll disagree with you, though- I am allowed to comment my viewpoint in > response to you, right? Or do I have to ask permission first? >
